An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Effect of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Mucociliary Clearance in Patients of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Shivam Agarwal, Rohit Sharma, Vineet Kumar Sharma, Amit Kumar Rana

Keywords : Cilia, Chronic rhinosinusitis, Mucociliary clearance, Nasal physiology, Nose, Saccharine

Citation Information : Agarwal S, Sharma R, Sharma VK, Rana AK. Effect of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Mucociliary Clearance in Patients of Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2021; 13 (2):37-39.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1381

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-11-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Introduction: Mucociliary clearance is a nonspecific defense mechanism that removes mucus and other materials from the nose and lungs. During functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) sometimes there is damage to a lot of healthy sinonasal mucosa. This study was carried out to measure the outcome of mucociliary clearance test before and after FESS. Materials and methods: Study group included 44 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) posted for FESS. Mucociliary clearance testing was performed with saccharine pellets. Observations: The age of patients ranged between 10 and 80 years with 25% between 20 and 30 years and 20% between 30 and 40 years of age. Forty percent of patients had bilateral nasal obstruction as the primary nasal complaint. Nasal discharge was seen in 30% of patients. One-third of patients had complete loss of smell. It was observed that the mean time taken for the concentration of saccharine appreciation in the oropharynx for mucociliary clearance preoperative was 58 minutes. Postoperatively at 6 weeks, it was 14 minutes and 12 minutes at 10 weeks. Discussion and conclusion: Mucociliary clearance as one of the parameters of nasal physiology was evaluated in the patients using saccharine test. Our study revealed after comparing the results in the postoperative period, the percentage was raised from 70% improvement at the 6th week to 85% at the 10th postoperative week. In our study, we saw that the saccharine test was easy to perform, saccharine was easily available, and it was cost-effective and could be applied to all patients of CRS to assess nasal physiology.

  1. Deborah S, Pratibha KM. Measurement of nasal mucociliary clearance. Clin Res Pulmo. 2014;2(2):1019. Available at: (accessed October 12, 2021).
  2. Ogle OE, Weinstock RJ, Friedman E. Surgical anatomy of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Oral Maxillifac Surg Clin N Am 2010;24(2):156–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2012.01.011.
  3. Sieron HL, Sommer F, Hoffmann TK et al. Function and physiology of the maxillary sinus. HNO. 2020;68(8):566-572. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00869-2.
  4. Slater A, Smallman LA, Logan AC, Drake-Lee AB. Mucociliary clearance in patients with nasal polyposis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996;21(4):343–47.
  5. Alobid I, Bernel-Sprekelsen M, Mulloj J. Chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis: the role of generic and specific questionnaires on assessing its impact on patient's quality of life. Allergy 2008;63(10):1267–1279. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01828.x.
  6. Mullol J, Alobid I. Combined oral and intranasal corticosteroid therapy: an advance in the management of nasal polyposis? Ann International Med 2011;154(5):365–367. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00011.
  7. Guielmany JM, Alobid I, Mullol J. Controversies in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2010:4(4):447–463. DOI: 10.1586/ers.10.49.
  8. Sahim Yilmaz A, Naclerio RM. Anatomy and physiology of upper airway. Proc Am Thrac Soc 2011;8(1):31–39. DOI: 10.1513/pats.201007-050RN.
  9. Patel RM, Pinto JM. Olfaction: anatomy, physiology and disease. Clin Anat 2014;27(1):54–60. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22338.
  10. Hasten D, Fokkens WJ, Bachert C, et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe- an underestimated disease. A GA2LEN study. Allergy 2011;66(9):1216–1223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02646.x.
  11. Chen Y, Dales R, Lin M. The epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis in Canadians. Laryngoscope 2003;113(7):1199–1205. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00016.
  12. Shashy RG, Moore EJ, Weaver A. Prevalence of the chronic sinusitis diagnosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130(3):320–323. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.3.320.
  13. Valía PL, Valero FC, Pardo JM, Rentero DB, Monte CG. Test de la sacarina en el estudio del aclaramiento mucociliar. Valores de referencia en una población española [Saccharin test for the study of mucociliary clearance: Reference values for a Spanish population]. Arch Bronconeumol. 2008;44(10):540-5. PMID: 19006634.
  14. Bhattacharya N. Symptoms and disease severity differences between nasal septum deviation and Chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005:133(2):173–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.082.
  15. Ling FT, Kountakis SE. Important clinical symptoms in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2007;117(6):1090–1093. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31804b1a90.
  16. Phillips KM, Hoehle LP, Bergmark RW, et al. Association between nasal obstruction and risk of depression in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;157(1):150–155. DOI: 10.1177/0194599817696294.
  17. Min YG, Yun YS, Song BH, et al. Recovery of nasal physiology after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: olfaction and mucociliary transport. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1995;57(5):264–268. DOI: 10.1159/000276755.
  18. Birdi SM, Singh S, Singh A. Mucociliary clearance in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;50(1):15–19. DOI: 10.1007/BF02996761.
  19. Shivakumar T, Sambauda AP. Retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in treatment of adult chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to medical treatment. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;63(4):321–324. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0238-2.
  20. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Olfactory improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;20(1):29–32. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834dfb3d.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.