An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Correlation between Vocal Fatigue and Voice Handicap in Primary School Teachers

D Thejaswi, Adheena Haridas, Jinumol Joseph

Citation Information : Thejaswi D, Haridas A, Joseph J. Correlation between Vocal Fatigue and Voice Handicap in Primary School Teachers. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2019; 11 (2):30-33.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1327

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-11-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: Teachers are occupational voice users reporting vocal fatigue as a frequent vocal discomfort. The vocal fatigue index (VFI) tool is a self-administered questionnaire proposed to measure individuals who have vocal fatigue. While research on another patient-administered questionnaire - the voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10), is extensive, experimental works in understanding the correlation between voice handicap and vocal fatigue are unknown. Aims and objectives: This study was undertaken to document vocal fatigue and voice handicap in primary school teachers and also understand the nature of correlation between VFI and VHI-10. Materials and methods: This study is a cross-sectional survey with convenience-type sampling. A total of 110 healthy females within the age of 22–50 years participated. Nonteachers (group I) and teachers (group II) rated the VFI and VHI-10 questionnaire as per its standard guidelines and the data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Results of the study revealed group I to have lower VHI-10 scores compared to group II. However, in the VFI questionnaire, group II scores were higher than group I. Independent t test revealed a statistically significant difference only for VFI at p < 0.05. Karl Pearson's correlation test indicated a strong positive relationship between VHI-10 and VFI. Conclusion: From the present study, it can be concluded that vocal fatigue is observable in primary school teachers compared to nonteachers. An increase in VFI scores predicts teachers who are at high-risk of developing voice handicap.

  1. Stemple JC. Principles of voice therapy. In: Stemple JC, Harpner ER, ed. Voice therapy: clinical studies. San Diego: Plural Publishers; 1993.
  2. Vilkman E. Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000;52(1–3):120–125. DOI: 10.1159/000021519.
  3. Koufman JA, Isaacson G. The spectrum of voice dysfunction. In: Koufman JA, Isaacson G, ed. Voice Disorders. Philadelphia, Pa: W.B. Saunders; 1991.
  4. Devadas U, Bellur R, Maruthy S. Prevalence and risk factors of voice problems among primary school teachers in India. J Voice 2017;31:117-e1–117-e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.006.
  5. WHOQOL Measuring Quality of Life. World Health Organization. 1997. [Last accessed on 2018 March 11]. Available from:
  6. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997;6:66–70. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66.
  7. Moradi N, Saki N, Aghadoost O, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice-related quality of life into Persian. J Voice 2014;28(6):842.e1–e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.013.
  8. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 2004;114(9):1549–1556. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009.
  9. Solomon NP. Vocal fatigue and its relation to vocal hyper function. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2008;10(4):254–266. DOI: 10.1080/14417040701730990.
  10. Luyten A, Bruneel L, Meerschman I, et al. Prevalence of vocal tract discomfort in the Flemish population without self-perceived voice disorders. J Voice 2016;30(3):308–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.017.
  11. Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, et al. Vocal fatigue index (VFI): development and validation. J Voice 2015;29(4):433–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.012.
  12. Banks RE, Bottalico P, Hunter EJ. The effect of classroom capacity on vocal fatigue as quantified by the vocal fatigue index. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2017;69(3):85–93. DOI: 10.1159/000484558.
  13. Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
  14. Fawcus M. Hyper functional voice: the misuse and abuse syndrome. In: Fawcus M, ed. Voice Disorders and Their Management. Boston, MA: Springer; 1991. pp. 139–175.
  15. Moghtader M, Soltani M, Mehravar M, et al. The relationship between vocal fatigue index and voice handicap index in university professors with and without voice complaint. J Voice 2019. S0892-1997(18)30543-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.01.010.
  16. Konnai RM, Jayaram M, Scherer RC. Development and validation of a voice disorder outcome profile for an Indian population. J Voice 2010;24(2):206–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.006.
  17. Vilkman E. Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2004;56(4):220–253. DOI: 10.1159/000078344.
  18. National Buildings Code of India. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2005. [Last accessed on 2018 March 11]. Available from:
  19. Sathyanarayan M, Boominathan P, Nallamuthu A. Vocal health practices among school teachers: a study from Chennai, India. J Voice 2019;33(5):812.e1–812.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.04.005.
  20. de Medeiros AM, Barreto SM, Assunção AÁ. Voice disorders (dysphonia) in public school female teachers working in Belo Horizonte: prevalence and associated factors. J Voice 2008;22(6):676–687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.008.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.