An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Mirror Image Pinna: A Rare Case Report

Purnima Joshi, Rajiv Jain, Priyanko Chakraborty, Sidharth Pradhan, Rakhi Kumari

Keywords : Mirror image pinna, Polyotia, Tubercles,Hillocks

Citation Information : Joshi P, Jain R, Chakraborty P, Pradhan S, Kumari R. Mirror Image Pinna: A Rare Case Report. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2017; 9 (3):106-108.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1277

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To report a rare congenital anomaly of the external ear. Background: Pinna or the external ear is the branchial apparatus derivative which may be anomalous due to error in embryological development many such anomalies are reported as anotia, microtia, preauricular sinus or cysts, tags, bat ear, etc. double pinna or the mirror image pinna is one such anomaly as others it may or may not be associated with syndromes. Case description: A 9-year-old boy presented with left ear mirror image pinna and right ear preauricular tag had no other complaints. On systemic examination, no abnormality was detected. The patient was advised surgery which was deferred by the patient for time being. Conclusion: Mirror image pinna is a rare congenital malformation which may or may not be associated with any syndromes. Surgical correction is possible which is done usually at age of 5–6 years. Clinical significance: To know the rare congenital malformation, its probable embryological cause, associated features, and its correction.


PDF Share
  1. Thorn L. Entwicklung des Ohres (einschließlich Entstehung von Missbildungen, experimentelle Embryologie und In-vitro-Studien).In: Helms J, Hrsg. Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie in Klinik und Praxis. Bd. 1. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1994. S. 1-22.
  2. Brent B. The pediatrician's role in caring for patients withcongenital microtia and atresia. Pediatr Ann 1999;28:374.
  3. Conway H, Wagner K. Congenital anomalies of the head andneck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965;36:71-79.
  4. Katzbach R, Klaiber S, Nitsch S, et al. Ohrmuschelre konstruktion beihochgradiger Mikrotie. HNO 2006;54:493-514.
  5. Gault D, Rothera M. Management of congenital deformities of the external and middle ear, Scott Brown's otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery 7th edition. p. 965-986.
  6. Lammer E. Preliminary observations on isotretinoin-induced ear malformations and pattern formation of the external ear. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1991;11:292-295.
  7. Otto HD. Pathogenese der Aurikularanhänge, Melotieund Polyotie Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979;225(1):45-56.
  8. Otto HD. Pathogenese der branchiogenenÜberschussbildungen. HNO Praxis. 1983;8:161-169:247-257.
  9. Gore SM, Myers SR, Gault D. Mirror ear: a reconstructive technique for substantial tragal anomalies or polyotia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:499-504.
  10. Bajaj Y, Sahni JK, Jain A, Kansal Y. Polyotia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:75-77.
  11. Moon IY, Oh KS. Surgical Correction of an Accessory Auricle, Polyotia, Archives of Plastic Surgery 2014;41:427-429.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.