An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2016 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Coblation vs Microdebrider-assisted Inferior Turbinoplasty

Amit Kumar, Rahul K Singh

Keywords : Coblation,Descriptive review,Inferior turbinate,Microdebrider,Turbinoplasty

Citation Information : Kumar A, Singh RK. Coblation vs Microdebrider-assisted Inferior Turbinoplasty. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2016; 8 (2):51-52.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1227

Published Online: 01-08-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of coblation and microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty in reducing nasal obstruction due to inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH).

Background

A comprehensive search of articles in English language was performed in PubMed using the keywords coblation turbinoplasty, coblation inferior turbinate reduction, microdebrider turbinoplasty, microdebrider assisted inferior turbinate reduction.

Review results

Primary search yielded 41 results with only two fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In both studies, patients were assessed objectively as well as subjectively. Improvement in nasal obstruction was similar in both coblation and microdebrider groups up to 6 months of follow-up in both studies. However, in the study by Lee and Lee (2006) at 12 months postoperative follow-up, microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty patients showed a better improvement in nasal obstruction both objectively on acoustic rhinometry and subjectively as compared with the coblation group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Despite getting better results with microdebriderassisted turbinoplasty in one of the study, it can be safely concluded that longer postsurgical follow-up period with bigger sample size is required to adequately comment on the extra benefit offered by either coblation or microdebrider.

Clinical significance

As and when further research is planned on comparing benefits of different powered instruments for turbinate reduction, it will be wise to prolong the follow-up period with increased sample size.

How to cite this article

Kumar A, Goyal A, Singh RK. Coblation vs Microdebrider-assisted Inferior Turbinoplasty. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2016;8(2):51-52.


PDF Share
  1. The early complications of inferior turbinectomy. J Laryngol Otol 1987 Nov;101(11):1136–1139.
  2. Microdebrider-assisted versus radiofrequency-assisted inferior turbinoplasty: a prospective study with objective and subjective outcome measures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2010 Jun;30(3):138–143.
  3. Powered submucous resection of the inferior turbinate. Balkan Med J [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Feb 22]; 2006(2). Available from: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/bmj/article/view/5000060123.
  4. Comparative study on the long-term effectiveness between coblation- and microdebrider-assisted partial turbinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2006 May;116(5):729–734.
  5. Inferior turbinate reduction; coblation versus microdebrider – a prospective, randomised study. Rhinology 2014 Dec;52(4):306–314.
  6. A safe, alternative technique for inferior turbinate reduction. Laryngoscope 1999 Nov;109(11):1834–1837.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.