An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Myringoplasty vs Conventional Myringoplasty

Manish Kumar, SK Kanaujia, Ashutosh Singh

Keywords : Chronic suppurative otitis media,Endoscopic,Myringoplasty

Citation Information : Kumar M, Kanaujia S, Singh A. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Myringoplasty vs Conventional Myringoplasty. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2015; 7 (3):132-137.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1209

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic myringoplasty and comparison with conventional myringoplasty.

Materials and methods

Sixty cases of clinically diagnosed chronic suppurative otitis media with dry central perforation were taken into account of which 30 cases were undergone endoscopic myringoplasty and 30 cases undergone conventional myringoplasty. All patients were followed up on 3rd, 7th, 15th day, 6th weeks, 3rd and 6th months after surgery.

Results

The tympanic membrane's perforation healing rate was 86% (26/30), in conventional group of myringoplasty and 83% (25/30) in endoscopic group of myringoplasty and average hearing gain in conventional group was 13.96 dB and in endoscopic group was 15.03 dB.

Conclusion

The surgical outcome of endoscope assisted myringoplasty in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement was comparable to the conventional microscope assisted myringoplasty, but in terms of cosmesis and postoperative recovery patients in the endoscope group had better results.

How to cite this article

Kumar M, Kanaujia SK, Singh A. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Myringoplasty vs Conventional Myringoplasty. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2015;7(3): 132-137.


PDF Share
  1. Endoscopic assisted middle ear surgery. In: Glasscock ME III, Gulya AJ, editors. Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed. Hamilton: Elsevier; 2003. p. 325–334.
  2. Endoscopic tympanoplasty—definitely advantageous (preliminary reports). Asian J Ear Nose Throat 2003;25:9–13.
  3. A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and micrsoscope assisted myringoplasty. Ind J Otolaryngol Hea 2008;60(4):298–302.
  4. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective. Europ Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014 Jul;271(7):1897–1902.
  5. Tympanoscopeassisted myringoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001 Nov-Dec;63(6):353–357.
  6. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty: a study. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;53:47–49.
  7. Endoscopeassisted myringoplasty. Singapore Med J 2009;50(5):510.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.