An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Have We Found an Ideal Grafting Material for Tympanoplasty? Cartilage Island Graft!

Afshan J Shaikh, Samir V Joshi, Rahul A Telang, Sanjaykumar L Sonawale, Rahul T Thakur

Keywords : Cartilage, Grafts, Island, Methods, Trends, Tympanoplasty

Citation Information : Shaikh AJ, Joshi SV, Telang RA, Sonawale SL, Thakur RT. Have We Found an Ideal Grafting Material for Tympanoplasty? Cartilage Island Graft!. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2022; 14 (1):26-30.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1417

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-04-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

The study was carried out to find out the ideal graft material by comparing the audiological outcome after tympanoplasty by using three different types of grafts: tragal cartilage, temporalis fascia, and cartilage island. The study included ninety patients, 30 in each group of tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia, tragal cartilage, and cartilage island by underlay technique. The patients were followed up for a period of 6 months, and hearing outcomes were compared by using pure-tone audiometry. The outcomes were analyzed in terms of residual perforation (graft uptake) and preoperative and postoperative hearing air–bone gap. Using statistical analysis, the cartilage island graft was found to be far superior to temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage grafts. The hearing outcome was improved in all groups but was statistically significant in the cartilage island group when compared to both the other groups (p <0.001). Hearing results of temporalis tympanoplasty and tragal cartilage tympanoplasty were similar and statistically insignificant (p = 1). Graft uptake of cartilage island was the best with no failures in our limited series. Graft uptake of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage were also good, with slightly better results in the temporalis fascia group than in the tragal cartilage graft group (statistically insignificant p = 1). Overall, cartilage island graft is much superior to either the temporalis fascia or the whole cartilage graft as far as both graft uptake and hearing results are concerned. Although it is a more skillful job as far as the technique is concerned, the superior results make it worth following by every otology surgeon.


PDF Share
  1. Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000;110(12):1994–1999. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200012000-00002.
  2. Gierek T, Slaska-Kaspera A, Majezal K, et al. Results of myringoplasty and type–I tympanoplasty with use of fascia, cartilage and perichondrium graft. Otolaryngol Pol 2004;18(3):529–533. PMID: 15311598.
  3. Kalcioglu T, Firat Y, Selimoglu E. Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique: a comparison with the temporalis muscle fascia technique. Int Adv Otol 2009;5:45–50.
  4. Vaidya S, Parikh V, Shah S, et al. Comparison of modified cartilage shield tympanoplasty with tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia only: retrospective analysis of 142 cases. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016;2016:8092328. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8092328.
  5. Hartwein J. “Crown–cork tympanoplasty” a method complete reconstruction of tympanic membrane. Laryngor–Hinootogies 1992;71(2):102–105. Pubmed ID:1571054.
  6. Aidonis I, Robertson TC, Sismanis A. Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: a reliable technique. Otol Neurotol 2005;26(5):838–841. DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185046.38900.1f.
  7. Khan MM, Parab SR. Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. Am J Otolaryngol 2011;32(5):381–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.07.010.
  8. Chhapola S, Matta I. Cartilage–perichondrium: an ideal graft material? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;64(3):208–213. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0306-7.
  9. Desarda KK, Bhisegaonkar DA, Gill S. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in reconstructive tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;57(1):9–12. DOI: 10.1007/BF02907617.
  10. Karaman E, Duman C, Isildak H, et al. Composite cartilage island grafts in type I tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):37–39. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c36283.
  11. Yurttas V, Yakut F, Kutluhan A, et al. Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2014;80(6):522. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.007.
  12. Genc S. A different cartilage graft technique: perichondrium–preserved palisade island graft in tympanoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(2):e166–e170. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002411.
  13. Tyagi BS, Tyagi S, Srivastava M, et al. Is cartilage-perichondrium composite graft tympanoplasty the ideal treatment for revision tympanoplasty? Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;3(1): 91–94. DOI: 10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20164807.
  14. Reddy R. Comparative study of results of cartilage-perichondrium vs temporalis fascia grafting in active tubotympanic type of chronic suppurative otitis media. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014;3(24):6714–6720. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2014/2809.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.