An International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Clinics

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Prevalence and Voice Characteristics in an Indian Treatment-seeking Population for Voice Disorders

Prisca M Thomas, Srikanth Nayak, Usha Devadas

Keywords : Epidemiology, Laryngeal pathology, Prevalence, Voice disorder

Citation Information : Thomas PM, Nayak S, Devadas U. Prevalence and Voice Characteristics in an Indian Treatment-seeking Population for Voice Disorders. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2021; 13 (3):110-117.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1391

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 21-04-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of a treatment-seeking population visiting the voice clinic of the Speech and Hearing department in a tertiary care hospital. Study design: Retrospective study. Methods: The study included patient's data who visited the voice clinic from January 2015 to January 2020. The retrospective data related to laryngeal pathology, age, gender, occupation, overall grade (G score of GRBAS), maximum phonation duration, S/Z ratio, and acoustic parameters (F0, jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio) were tabulated and analyzed. Results: The study results were analyzed and reported from 524 patient records. The frequency of organic/structural vocal pathology was observed to be higher (n = 468; 89.3%) than functional/nonstructural pathologies (n = 38; 7.3%). Vocal nodules (28.1%), vocal fold paralysis/paresis (15.5%), vocal fold edema (13.7%), sulcus vocalis (7.3%), and vocal polyps (6.1%) were the most common (those occurred in more than 5% of the patients) diagnosis observed for the overall sample. Male dysphonic patients (n = 283; 54%) outnumbered the females (n = 241; 46%). The majority of patients consulting the voice clinic for dysphonia were between 25 and 64 years. The most common occupations seeking help for voice problems were homemaker, student, teacher, business, farmer, retired, singer, and laborer. The overall perceived hoarseness was significantly higher in males compared to females. Conclusion: The present study results allowed a better understanding of characteristics of treatment-seeking population for voice disorders visiting voice clinic. Identification of characteristics and diagnosis of individuals seeking treatment for voice disorders help the speech language pathologists to increase the awareness among the general population about preventive voice care strategies.

  1. Stemple JC, Glaze LE, Klaben BG. Clinical voice pathology: theory and management. San Diego, CA: Plural; 2010.
  2. Best SR, Fakhry C. The prevalence, diagnosis, and management of voice disorders in a National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) cohort. Laryngoscope 2011;121:150–157. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21169.
  3. Coyle SM, Weinrich BD, Stemple JC. Shifts in relative prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population. J Voice 2001;15:424–440. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00043-1.
  4. De Bodt M, Van Den Steen L, Mertens F, et al. Characteristics of a dysphonic population referred for voice assessment and/or voice therapy. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2016;67:178–186. DOI: 10.1159/000369339.
  5. Mozzanica F, Ginocchio D, Barillari R, et al. Prevalence and voice characteristics of laryngeal pathology in an Italian voice therapy-seeking population. J Voice 2016;30:774.e13–774.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.11.018.
  6. Remacle A, Petitfils C, Finck C, et al. Description of patients consulting the voice clinic regarding gender, age, occupational status, and diagnosis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2017;274:1567–1576. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4332-7.
  7. Thijs Z, Knickerbocker K, Watts CR. Epidemiological patterns and treatment outcomes in a private practice community voice clinic. J Voice 2020;S0892-1997(20)30243-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.025.
  8. Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, D'Haeseleer E, et al. The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population with dysphonia. Laryngoscope 2010;120:306–312. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20696.
  9. Watts CR, Knickerbocker K. Characteristics of a treatment-seeking population in a private practice community voice clinic: an epidemiologic study. J Voice 2019;33:429–434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.019.
  10. Woo SH, Kim RB, Choi SH, et al. Prevalence of laryngeal disease in South Korea: data from the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey from 2008 to 2011. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:499–507. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.499.
  11. Cohen SM, Kim J, Roy N, et al. Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment-seeking population. Laryngoscope 2012;122:343–348. DOI: 10.1002/lary.22426.
  12. dos Santos AP, Silverio KCA, Dassie-Leite AP, et al. Relation between musculoskeletal pain and voice self-assessment in tele-operators. J Voice 2019;33:948.e11–948.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.006.
  13. Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R, Fredlund P, et al. Prevalence of voice disorders in the general population, based on the Stockholm Public Health Cohort. J Voice 2019;33:900–905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.007.
  14. De La Fuente J, Garrett CG, Ossoff R, et al. A case series of the probability density and cumulative distribution of laryngeal disease in a tertiary care voice center. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017;126:748–754. DOI: 10.1177/0003489417728945.
  15. Hertegård S. Voice problems in a small Swedish town: a retrospective study of the prevalence and a follow-up. J Voice 1988;1:336–340. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80008-0.
  16. Herrington-Hall B, Lee L, Stemple JC, et al. Description of laryngeal pathologies by age, sex, and occupation in a treatment-seeking sample. J Speech Hear Disord 1988;53:57–64. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5301.57.
  17. Johns MM, Garrett CG, Ossoff RH, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes following laryngeal endoscopic surgery for non-neoplastic vocal fold lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2004;113:597–601. DOI: 10.1177/000348940411300801.
  18. Hummel C, Scharf M, Schuetzenberger A, et al. Objective voice parameters and self-perceived handicap in dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2010;62:303–307. DOI: 10.1159/000287715.
  19. Smits R, Marres H, De Jong F. The relation of vocal fold lesions and voice quality to voice handicap and psychosomatic well-being. J Voice 2012;26:466–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.005.
  20. Cohen SM. Self-reported impact of dysphonia in a primary care population: an epidemiological study. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2022–2032. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21058.
  21. Zhukhovitskaya A, Battaglia D, Khosla SM, et al. Gender and age in benign vocal fold lesions. In: Laryngoscope. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2015. p. 191–196.
  22. Martins RHG, do Amaral HA, Tavares ELM, et al. Voice disorders: etiology and diagnosis. J Voice 2016;30:761.e1–761.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.017.
  23. Vilkman E. Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement. In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2000. p. 120–125.
  24. Butler JE, Hammond TH, Gray SD. Gender-related differences of hyaluronic acid distribution in the human vocal fold. Laryngoscope 2001;111:907–911. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200105000-00029.
  25. Ward PD, Thibeault SL, Gray SD. Hyaluronic acid: its role in voice. J Voice 2002;16:303–309. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00101-7.
  26. Chan RW, Gray SD, Titze IR. The importance of hyaluronic acid in vocal fold biomechanics. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2001;124:607–614. DOI: 10.1177/019459980112400602.
  27. Hirano M, Kurita S, Matsuo K, et al. Laryngeal tissue reaction to stress. In: Lawrence V, editor. 9th symposium on care of the professional voice. New York, NY: The Voice Foundation; 1980. p. 10–20.
  28. Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E. Sociodemographic variables of a German sample of patients with contact granuloma. J Voice 1995;9:449–452. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80209-7.
  29. Schneider B, Bigenzahn W. Influence of glottal closure configuration on vocal efficacy in young normal-speaking women. J Voice 2003;17:468–480. DOI: 10.1067/S0892-1997(03)00065-1.
  30. Pontes P, Kyrillos L, Behlau M, et al. Vocal nodules and laryngeal morphology. J Voice 2002;16:408–414. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00112-1.
  31. Karkos PD, George M, Van Der Veen J, et al. Vocal process granulomas: a systematic review of treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2014;123:314–320. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414525921.
  32. Wang CP, Ko JY, Wang YH, et al. Vocal process granuloma – a result of long-term observation in 53 patients. Oral Oncol 2009;45:821–825. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.01.008.
  33. Byeon H, Lee Y. Laryngeal pathologies in older Korean adults and their association with smoking and alcohol consumption. Laryngoscope 2013;123:429–433. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23603.
  34. Baker J. Psychogenic voice disorders–heroes or hysterics? A brief overview with questions and discussion. Logop Phoniatr Vocol 2002;27:84–91. DOI: 10.1080/140154302760409310.
  35. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000;49:147. PMID: 10718692.
  36. Roy N, Merrill RM, Gray SD, et al. Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1988–1995. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000179174.32345.41.
  37. Turley R, Cohen S. Impact of voice and swallowing problems in the elderly. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:33–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.010.
  38. Cantarella G, Dejonckere P, Galli A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of the etiology of unilateral vocal fold paralysis over the last 25 years. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2017;274:347–353. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4225-9.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.